Jordi

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 57 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Nondestructive copy/paste? #2058
    Jordi
    Participant

    Pretty far from Vancouver, though.

    in reply to: Nondestructive copy/paste? #2056
    Jordi
    Participant

    Where are you?

    (Cheers for getting my tone, and not being offended!)

    in reply to: Nondestructive copy/paste? #2054
    Jordi
    Participant

    I don’t mean to be rude, and I hope this doesn’t come across this way, but from my perspective, asking for a workshop in the same thread that you ask for features that already exist and are really clearly defined in the manual seems sort of odd.

    Like, if it was clear that you had taken the time to read the manual, and were having trouble, then (if I were Gabriel) I’d be more inclined to look at how to help you. But when you say you’ve read the manual a couple of times but don’t show any awareness of something that has a full page devoted to it (and it’s own button), it’s sort of like, well, then I would think you’re wasting my time with your workshop request. I’m sure Gabriel has a ton on his plate.

    But this happens in every piece of gear and software I know. You go visit their forums and there’s some guy saying, "How do you do so-and-so?" and some other guy responding, "Read the manual." It’s not a very useful answer, and I get that there are people who get a lot from manuals and people who learn much better by seeing.

    Make sure you have the octopus in front of you, and try the things you’re reading as you read them. Sitting and reading the manual in a different room has limited value.

    Also, I keep re-reading the manual. Even the bits I think I know. The thing is, when you play with it for a few weeks, and then read the manual, you come at the manual with a different perspective, so that your comprehension of things changes. When you first give it a read, there’s so much info thrown at you that you miss tons of stuff – like how you missed the description of the flat function, probably. But when you go back, and you’re like, "Yeah, I get it. Yeah, I get it. Wait, what’s this mean?" then you find all sorts of stuff. It’s like, my first read got the basics, but each re-read I now find I pull more out of because it’s all in there, but it was too much to take in at first. I’ve had my Octopus for three months, and I’m constantly finding better work flow habits for me. And it comes from finding that one sentence you glossed over last read, but suddenly it stands out. I honestly think a workshop would be about the same: there would be too much info thrown at you, and it wouldn’t be really that useful for you. You need time to define your own workflow; there’s so many ways of doing any given task with this beast (which is one of the greatest things about it), that you really just need time, I think. (Also, are you aware of the youtube videos?)

    So, sorry for the ramble, but to sum up:

    In my opinion, good advice would be:

    1)Make sure you read the manual with the Octopus/Nemo in front of you, and try everything as you read it.
    2)Re-read the manual every couple of weeks for a bit, and then every couple of months, or whatever, because you’ll find that things you ignored before are now describing the exact feature you need.

    And if you need any help with comprehension of something, ask the boards. I’d be happy to help all I can. But asking for workshops is a lot of work for others when it sounds like maybe you haven’t spent as much time with the manual as you should. It’s a super complicated device, and there’s no shortcut – it just takes time. Like any musical instrument.
    :)

    in reply to: New method for muting steps – track length #2037
    Jordi
    Participant

    There was a conflict with the way the mute recall worked the old way, I believe.

    But I agree: we need a way to easily set track length.

    in reply to: Vampire! #1999
    Jordi
    Participant

    Yeah, I’m a *little* bit sad that I got a plain old ugly one in August.

    *don’t tell my Octopus that I called her ugly, and also, I’m just joking*

    in reply to: Visual help – a tip #1973
    Jordi
    Participant

    That does look sharp. I don’t dare do it myself, because I’ll end up with something idiotic, I’m sure.

    in reply to: Gigging with the Nemo #1969
    Jordi
    Participant

    I’ve heard Autechre’s recent shows have been very good.

    in reply to: Limelite style remix function #1923
    Jordi
    Participant

    Well, it’s sort of the track direction function, but with

    a) more patterns available

    b) the ability to have tracks jump from forward direction to another pattern with a single button push, and have them return to forward with the button release

    c) the ability to easily automate periodic activation of function b. I guess you might be able to do it with the effector or step events now, but it’s complicated, especially if the tracks you want to effect are across multiple pages.

    in reply to: Limelite style remix function #1918
    Jordi
    Participant

    That’s what the remix "now" button does in limelite. You can automate to work every so often or turn it on immediately.

    in reply to: Limelite style remix function #1908
    Jordi
    Participant

    Okay, I emailed one of the designers of Limelite and the CEO of NI. I’m hoping the spirit of collaboration will win over.

    in reply to: Limelite style remix function #1906
    Jordi
    Participant

    I get what you’re saying but they encourage you in the Reaktor manual to reverse engineer their patches. I’m going to track down the designer and see if I can get an okay from him on the patterns, because they work really well.

    in reply to: New user – first post #1862
    Jordi
    Participant

    It certainly changed the way I create.

    in reply to: weird behavior #1860
    Jordi
    Participant

    No, I don’t think it has anything to do with the sound engine. I’ve had it happen when I was using Live with Virus Control active, in which case it was behaving the same whether the MIDI was routed back to the Virus or to another sound source (with the Virus playing nothing), and I’ve had it happen when using Max, without the Virus Control plug-in, and I was working on a patch that didn’t route the MIDI to any sound sources (I was just watching the incoming messages).

    It’s quite curious how it only happens for legato playing. Because when I switch it to staccato, the note on and note offs are quite a bit closer together in timing, but they play fine. That doesn’t make any sense, because it seems to suggest that the Virus is "interpreting" incoming MIDI instead of just passing it on.

    By the way, last night the Virus was in single mode with one of the default >>INPUT<< patches active, and, as I said, a reboot cleared it, though it was in the exact same state (meaning that input patch is the boot-up patch, and I didn’t touch a single knob or switch).

    in reply to: weird behavior #1846
    Jordi
    Participant

    It’s the Virus! It just happened again, and I was able to try another MIDI device to confirm that the Octopus was sending the correct messages. I rebooted the Virus and it disappeared, too. It is pretty weird behavior: non-overlapping notes play fine but legato notes it drops every other note message, whether on or off, so you get missing notes or hanging notes depending on note length (that’s a simplification but is pretty close to exact). And I’m not talking about as a sound module, I was just feeding it into Max and printing note messages.

    I’m relieved that it’s not my Octopus, that it’s something I can work around with another MIDI interface, and that it seems to be solved by a quick reboot. That’s three kinds of relief.

    in reply to: weird behavior #1844
    Jordi
    Participant

    Yeah, having it running is a relief. I was envisioning having to ship it back to germany to be checked out, which I wasn’t terribly enthusiastic about….

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 57 total)