Andrew Capon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: instant page switching video #2589
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Anyone any idea how to turn this mode off and haze it quantised to bar start?

    Cheers

    Andy

    in reply to: undocumented feature!? #2557
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Have you worked out how to turn this feature off at all?

    in reply to: Possible POS bug #2566
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Just had an email From Marcel, they know about the problem and Gabriel is working on a fix.

    Andy

    in reply to: Possible POS bug #2553
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Yep same here!!

    in reply to: Nemo OS v1.62 #2493
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Gabriel just emailed me, power on while pressing ESC.

    in reply to: Nemo OS v1.62 #2492
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    I have not been able to find any info of how to upload this update to the NEMO.

    Anyone know how?

    Thanks

    Andy

    in reply to: Track RMX #2464
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Thanks for the reply.

    Remix for me just creates totally random step patterns like described on page 39.

    It doesn’t seem to do this:

    Quote:
    Track remixes (RMX)

    The track remix is used to generate variations of a track without al-
    tering it too much. It does have some random elements which are in-
    fuenced by the value indicated in AMT.

    For every step in the track, a random step offset for VEL will be gen-
    erated. The same applies to the LEN, STA and POS attributes.
    The step offsets set will be shifted against the actual steps by a ran-
    dom position for all of the attributes listed above.
    Assuming you had all steps on, and two non-zero offsets on two adja-
    cent steps, the RMX operation will move those offsets to a random
    position in the track, such that two different adjacent steps will play
    the respective offsets.

    For instance if I set AMT to 0 and then press remix I would expect it to do nothing but what it does do is just generate a random note pattern altering nothing els.

    Cheers

    Andy

    Post edited by: BobTheDog, at: 2009/07/19 08:20

    Post edited by: BobTheDog, at: 2009/07/19 08:21

    in reply to: Octopus or Nemo? #2461
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Hi,

    Are you the same bphenix from electro-music?

    Too late the nemo arrives today :)

    I spoke to Gabriel over email and the internal processor and memory board of the Nemo are the same as the octopus.

    This means the current 16 track limitation (and the other limitations) are due to interface issues on the nemo (less buttons), Genoqs are thinking about and discussing expanding the Nemo nearer to the octopus in functionality.

    That swung it!

    Cheers

    Andy

    Post edited by: BobTheDog, at: 2009/07/17 07:26

    in reply to: Octopus or Nemo? #2435
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    Thanks for the replies.

    I have had a look through the manual and the Nemo seems as well as having less tracks to have less editablility as well.

    Both look very interesting but I don’t think I can justify the cost of the Octopus with the current exchange rate even if it is the one I most desire.

    Maybe the Nemo is for me.

    Cheers

    Andy

    in reply to: Octopus or Nemo? #2427
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Hi,

    Thanks for the reply.

    I did have a look at it but it doesn’t seem to have much detail.

    I have downloaded both manuals and am reading through them maybe that will shed some light on the chart!

    Andy

    in reply to: Maybe the only good reason to look into OSC #2297
    Andrew Capon
    Participant

    Hi Guys,

    The Ethernet will be used for OSC, this is currently in development.

    Cheers

    Andy

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)