robert wrote:
Quote:
So yes, it’s likely that a solid patch will be accepted by the guys. But since we’re pushing the concept behind the Nemo (keep it simple) with this new proposal, I’m not 100% sure in this case.
Well, that’s why I was excited by this:
adam wrote:
Quote:
The second is that this functionality wouldn’t interfere with anything existing. Anyone who never wanted to touch the expanded capacity wouldn’t have to alter the workflow at all, and from my point of view that’s a sign of a good modification. It’s invisible unless you need it.
It seems to me that you could integrate it into the existing Nemo concepts/workflow/etc. and people wouldn’t even know it was there unless they wanted to investigate.