Forum Replies Created
August 6, 2009 at 11:51 in reply to: Nemo OS v1.62 #2510
Can you take a look at the USB route? it is slightly more technical but it is a very safe bet. The document is at the bottom of the software download page. Write me an email if you have any questions.
GabrielAugust 6, 2009 at 11:48 in reply to: Octopus dead after upgrade attempt #2506
OK – getting closer.
There are 2 versions of 1.60: the .27 (the one coming from v1.42) and the .32 release. They only differ in 2 very minor bug fixes. It appears however that .27 has trouble with 1.62.00 while 1.60.32 is fine. So far so good. Why the USB method would fail is still puzzling though..
Post edited by: gseher, at: 2009/08/06 13:49August 6, 2009 at 11:42 in reply to: legato notes? #2504
Have you checked out the current OS? It is in there in my opinion.
GabrielAugust 6, 2009 at 11:39 in reply to: Nemo OS v1.62 #2507
Do you have the possibility to try another MIDI interface?August 3, 2009 at 11:05 in reply to: Late night wish list! MAP performance features #2482
I think this would add to the interactive feel of working with the machine and increase workflow speed. Any more ideas along the same lines?
gabrielAugust 3, 2009 at 11:01 in reply to: Extended cluster controls #2481
Excellent input – thanks Matt!July 24, 2009 at 10:18 in reply to: user scales #2479
The current force-to-scale implementation is quite simple, you can imagine it as follows:
A note is checked for its belonging to the current scale.
If it is in the scale it is left alone and played.
Otherwise it is being "pitched" up until it belongs to the scale and then it is played.
Cheers, GabrielJuly 23, 2009 at 09:53 in reply to: Urgent problem with clusters #2473
The request for align at 1 of the masterclock sounds more than valid to me.
The next question is – does anyone think that making ALN (align) generally work on the 1 of the masterclock, and not anymore as it works now will represent a loss?
GabrielJuly 23, 2009 at 09:45 in reply to: user scales #2471
Hi Matt, thanks again, and yes, please do put it all into a table if you get a chance.
I am evaluating this, and I have a feeling there is much fun to be had. I am getting also excellent input "ofline" (via email), and it seems there is quite some variation in the ideas about how this all should work..
Very exciting ideed!July 23, 2009 at 09:31 in reply to: Performance Preview? #2469
Yes, this is about transposing sequences (tracks) and partially steps in realtime during performance. The requester of the feature brought up the name, I guess to help explain his point and it stuck..
OK – on the radar and to be fixed.July 14, 2009 at 08:51 in reply to: program change? #2428
Fixed in the next OS.July 14, 2009 at 08:44 in reply to: user scales #2449
One problem I see here is that you will in most cases alter the pitch of the bottom rows, but changing the pitch of the top rows will require a lot of fingers
Would it not be better to work with force to scale and have the keys influence the scale rather than the track pitches directly?July 14, 2009 at 08:33 in reply to: Step copy/paste in page mode #2451
OK – the step copy / paste is now in.
I like the multi-compress into one step idea as well, but it will have to wait a little..July 14, 2009 at 08:29 in reply to: positive and negative values #2431
We had experimented with this a while ago and while it is visually great, what you propose makes it hard to read out values, if that is what you need to do.
Any other opinions on this? I have always wondered how often values are actually read as numbers anyway..